I’m really not much of a fan. I don’t get all weak in the knees over much of anybody. I’ve worked with rock stars, movie stars, billionaires and geniuses and pretty much kept an even keel (I did stammer when I met Neil Young – I really wasn’t prepared to be as impressed as I was.). My adoration for the New York Times, however, is a bit out of control.
I’ve only had a few mentions in the NY Times but each one has felt like a life-changing event – for me anyway.
One of my clients, KOYONO, had a product reviewed by Michelle Slatalla in the Style section. I wrote a piece called, “How Michelle Slatalla Ruined MY Summer” that I have yet to publish anywhere, but the title tells it all. I spent most of the summer trying to calm customers who were waiting for us to catch up with a week of sales that took four months to deliver on. Still, it was a proud moment – to be acknowledged in the most widely read newspaper in the US – and a lot of the world.
But my aspirations have always been to have my words, not my products, featured in those pages.
I’ve written a handful of letters to the editor as a way of dealing with this yearning.
My first letter that was published in the New York Times was penned in about 3 minutes. In 2005, I had developed the habit of thouroughly enjoying the snarky headiness of Maureen Dowd as an antidote to the output of the Bush administration. I had a little ritual around Sunday morning coffee, a quiet spot, and the NYT Week in Review. There was always a lot of erudite seriousness – which is great fun and restorative to my faith in humanity – and some more visceral joys from Laugh Lines and Ms. Dowd. When I read that her column was moving from Sunday to Wednesday, I wrote a few lines about how I would miss the Sunday morning moral guidance from Reverand Dowd. This is what I wrote:
Re: “A Letter from the Editor:”
As you describe so aptly, I am one of those readers for whom the New York Times and it’s layout are personally important. This change in format will be painful. Although I spend most of my days encouraging friends, clients, and politicians to embrace change and consider possibilities outside their past experiences, I have become religious about my adherence to a Sunday morning routine that includes a well-honed playlist from my iPod, caffeinated coffee communion and a sermon from Pastor Maureen Dowd. I am now torn as to whether I should save Wednesday’s paper until Sunday, or move my sabbath.
Maureen, if you are listening, I seek your guidance.
James R Haviland
Durham, NC
I don’t think I even spell checked it. The letter was edited a bit to avoid the wrath of those easily offended by faux-religous references, but within a few days my note was in the paper. I even got a nice note, a t-shirt, and a book from Ms. Dowd.
My most recent letter was published on a day of interesting historical intersections. Februaury 22, 2009 was my father’s 69th birthday. My father was a banker and taught me a great deal about economics both directly and through the event that changed his life forever, the failure of Northern Ohio Bank on February 14th, 1975. As an officer of the bank, my father was investigated, though later proven innocent, in what turned out to be a scandal involving loans, the mob, lies and greed. I was about to turn twelve at the time. I have always been very aware of the power and neccesity of banks in the processes of wealth creation, but also of their limitations.
Now that I have my own son who just turned 12 and a certain number of bank failures( from fraud, etc) have put my business and most businesses in a tenous spot, I am reminded of the need for all the players in the economy to contribute in a balanced way, constently reassessing the means and methods of investment, but with a knowledge that there are levels of investment that are required of any business or economy in the source and means of growth and in a balanced portfolio of short, medium, and long range return prospects.
So my note, (published Sunday 2/22) offers my support for the Stimulus Bill as a source of catch-up funds for infrastructure, research, and education. My broader thought is that we could calculate a minimum level of funding that the federal government should be spending on these categories – and that we’ve been far behind for a long time.
In same section where my note appears, Thomas Friedman (Krugman is my present cerebral crush, sorry Maureen) makes a passing case for funding venture funds instead of banks. Not exactly in line with my recommendations, but closer. I have an idea for a short research project that I’ll be working on around that idea.
What is the long run return rate of top venure firms or funds? What is the average of all the top quadrille?
How many investments are needed for portfolio effects to be in force?
Send me your notes!